Bài đọc · ~159 từ
AFor decades, staying at one company for most of a career was considered a sign of reliability, while frequent job changes raised doubts about a candidate's commitment or ability to get along with others.
BThat perception has shifted considerably, particularly among younger professionals who argue that moving between companies every two or three years often brings faster pay growth and broader experience than staying loyal to a single employer that may offer only modest, incremental raises.
CEmployers, for their part, remain somewhat divided. Some now view a varied work history as evidence of adaptability, while others still quietly favour candidates who demonstrate sustained commitment, suspecting that frequent movers may simply leave again once a slightly better offer appears.
DThe more nuanced view emerging among recruiters is that the reason behind each move matters far more than the number of moves itself; a candidate who can clearly articulate what each transition achieved is judged quite differently from one who cannot.