Bài đọc · ~185 từ
AThe popular framing of negotiation as fundamentally adversarial, a contest in which one side's gain necessarily equals the other side's loss, has been increasingly challenged by negotiation researchers, who argue that many business disputes contain more room for mutual benefit than either party initially assumes.
BA central concept in this collaborative approach is identifying each side's actual underlying interest, rather than their stated position; a client insisting on a lower price, for instance, might genuinely care more about predictable monthly costs than about the headline number itself, opening room for a creative alternative neither side had initially proposed.
CUnderstanding one's own best alternative to a negotiated agreement, often abbreviated as BATNA, provides a crucial reference point throughout a negotiation, since a party with a genuinely strong alternative can afford patience that one without any realistic fallback option simply cannot.
DEven negotiators committed to a collaborative approach caution against naivety, however; occasionally a counterpart genuinely does intend to extract maximum value with no real interest in a durable relationship, and recognising this pattern early, rather than persisting indefinitely in good faith, remains an essential negotiating skill.